Microsoft-Yahoo! Con-fusión

Posted on Saturday 23 February 2008

Kevin Johnson, presidente de la división de servicios de plataformas de Microsoft ha mandado este mail a los empleados de la compañía que se ha filtrado a los medios especializados ( lo he encontrado en TechCrunch )

En él se aclaran algunas dudas surgidas ante la posible fusión Microsoft - Yahoo. Y el tono general del comunicado da bastante por sentada la unión de la compañías, cosa que por aquí en Yahoo! aún no está tan clara.

From: Kevin Johnson
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 12:48 PM
To: Platforms & Services Division
Subject: Update on Yahoo! Proposal

I want to provide all employees in the Platforms & Services Division with an update on our February 1 proposal to combine with Yahoo!, and answer a few common questions that have been asked.

As we’ve discussed, the online advertising industry is growing rapidly and is expected to be an $80B industry by 2010. We believe our proposal is a compelling one and that the combination of Yahoo! and Microsoft creates a more credible alternative to an increasingly dominant player in the advertising industry. We are committed to building great services for consumers while delivering great value to advertisers and publishers. We have been very thoughtful about this combination, and are excited about what our two companies can do together to collectively target growth opportunities in online services, search, and advertising.

It is important to remember that, while we have made what we believe to be a very compelling proposal for Yahoo! shareholders and employees, we do not have an agreement in place with Yahoo! at this time. While Yahoo!’s Board and management consider our proposal, let me share a perspective on the process going forward:

While Yahoo! has issued a press release rejecting our proposal, we continue to believe we have a full and fair proposal on the table. We look forward to a constructive dialogue with Yahoo!’s Board, management, shareholders, and employees on the value of this combination and its strategic and financial merits.

If and when Yahoo! agrees to proceed with the proposed transaction, we will go through the process to receive regulatory approval, and expect that this transaction will close in the 2nd half of calendar year 2008. Until this proposal is accepted and receives regulatory approval, we must continue to operate our business as we do today and compete in this rapidly changing online services and advertising marketplace.

It is important to note that once Yahoo! and Microsoft agree on a transaction, we can begin the integration planning process in parallel with the regulatory review. We can create the integration plan but we cannot begin to implement it until we have formal regulatory approval and have closed the transaction. Because the integration process will be critical to our success as a combined company, we are taking this very seriously. We have recent – and successful - experience in this arena, including our integration planning with aQuantive and Tellme, both of which led to successful combinations of talent, assets, and infrastructure.

Our proposal includes a thoughtful integration planning process for a Microsoft-Yahoo! combination. It is important to me that this process includes leaders from Yahoo! and Microsoft and is done in a way that enables us, together, to make decisions in a collaborative way. Importantly, this will be an inclusive process with Yahoo! employees as they are a key part of our success as a combined company.

With the above process and timeline in mind, I want our teams to stay focused on existing commitments and goals. We should continue to make progress against our plans for online services.

There has been a lot written about various aspects of our proposal. And there are compelling opportunities and tough challenges ahead. While it’s hard to predict the future, I want to convey my sense of where things are by responding to a set of common questions that have come up from employees.

Q: What are the benefits of a Microsoft-Yahoo! combination?

A: First, the industry needs a more compelling alternative in search and online advertising. I have personally met with top executives of the major media companies, and I know there is a desire for more competition in search and online advertising. Without this, there’s less innovation, less competition, and less value being generated for consumers, advertisers, and publishers. Together, Microsoft and Yahoo! would have an opportunity to change and evolve the experiences and value we deliver to all of these groups.

For consumers and developers, our expanded R&D capacity would allow us to drive innovation in emerging user experiences in areas such as search, video, mobile, commerce, and social media. Already, our collaborative work with Yahoo! on interoperability between our instant messaging services has benefitted consumers and made it easier for them to stay connected with friends and family.

For advertisers and publishers, scale economics would allow us to deliver more value to this customer base. By combining search and non-search advertising inventory on a single ad platform, yield is also improved. The other benefits and opportunities may include improving return on investment and decreasing the cost and complexity of running multiple campaigns. We also believe in an extensible ad platform. From my discussions with top advertising agency executives, they share this belief and want to play a key role in extending this ad platform for incremental value to advertisers.

For shareholders, a successful combination would provide superior value and an opportunity to participate in the upside of the combined company. There are expected operating efficiencies driven by synergies from eliminating redundant operating expenses, redundant capital expenses, and ensuring appropriate headcount allocation by function.

The focus of our combined company will be to build great experiences and platforms for our joint consumers, advertisers, and publishers. I am confident in the collective engineering & business talent we have at Microsoft and Yahoo! to drive towards this vision.

Q: What impact would this combination have on staffing? Would there be any reductions?

A: People are the single most important asset in this combination. We want the very best talent at the combined company, and we will demonstrate this to Yahoo! and Microsoft employees at each step of the deal. There’s no question we will dedicate significant rewards and compensation to Yahoo! and Microsoft employees.

While some overlap is expected in any combination of this size, we should remember that Microsoft is a growth company that has hired over 20,000 people since 2005, and we would look to place talented employees throughout the company as a whole. We have no shortage of business and technical opportunities, and we need great people to focus on them.

Q: How should we view the two cultures at Microsoft and Yahoo!? How would we bring the two cultures together?

A: Both companies share a passion for great engineering, creativity, and development of services and technologies that truly can change the world. Respect for both the creative and analytical aspects of advertising is core to both companies, along with recognition that advertising is an industry that represents opportunity and growth. We would have an opportunity to bring together the best of both companies – Microsoft’s culture of innovation, and long-term commitment to tough R&D problems, with Yahoo!’s blend of Web-centric DNA and innovative engineering, 21st century media expertise, and advertising talent. Some aspects of the two cultures will naturally merge quickly and some will remain unique in the near-term and merge more slowly over time. At Microsoft today, we have a corporate culture, but individual teams develop, nurture, and retain a culture of their own as well. The culture of the combined entity will be shaped by individuals and teams from both Yahoo! and Microsoft.

Q: How would we address the multiple brands and technologies within Live, MSN, and Yahoo!? Which brand would we keep?

A: Both Microsoft and Yahoo! have great brands and technologies. Yahoo! has a very strong consumer brand and we are committed to build on the Yahoo! brand as a major part of the combined products and services we deliver to customers. The Yahoo! brand is one of the reasons the combination of the two companies would create so much value. It is premature to say which aspects of the brands and technologies we would use in our combined offerings. As part of the integration planning effort, it is important that we enable a joint team of leaders from Microsoft and Yahoo! to make thoughtful decisions about brands and technologies. How we integrate Microsoft and Yahoo!’s brands, products, and services are the types of decisions that would be made during this integration planning process—by leaders from both companies—and implemented over time after the transaction closes.

Q: If we move forward with a combination, what’s our plan for addressing Yahoo!’s technology infrastructure, since it’s non-Windows based?

A: Services we’ve acquired over the years have been based on both Windows and open source technologies. Although Windows is our strategic platform and in some cases the teams ultimately migrated their products to Windows for a variety of reasons, in other cases we have prioritized continuity and have used open interoperability mechanisms to achieve effective systems integration. Yahoo! has made significant investments in both its skills and technologies, so we would work closely with Yahoo! engineers to make pragmatic platform and integration methodology decisions as appropriate, prioritizing above all how those decisions would impact customers.

Q: Would we maintain locations in both Silicon Valley and Redmond?

A: Absolutely. Silicon Valley is one of Microsoft’s largest presences outside our Redmond headquarters, with nearly 1,800 employees in a variety of key engineering and business roles. Yahoo!’s campus houses over 10,000 employees and plays a key part in their innovative culture. In bringing the companies together, we would be committed to maintaining Yahoo!’s significant presence in Silicon Valley, and we anticipate that there would be exciting opportunities for a combined Microsoft and Yahoo! talent base in Silicon Valley, Redmond, and many other cities worldwide.

Q: How should we interact with Yahoo! employees?

A: It’s important that Microsoft employees not speculate with Yahoo! employees about the proposal or about what a deal would mean for the combined company. Prior to close of the transaction, no Microsoft employee should reach out to Yahoo! employees for the purpose of integration planning unless specifically instructed to do so by the integration team and its LCA advisors.

Prior to the close, we must continue to compete with Yahoo! as before. At the same time, there are areas where we partner with Yahoo!. If you have questions about what is permissible, please contact your team’s LCA leader.

Q: How does this impact our relationship with customers and partners?

A: Our commitment to customers and partners remains paramount. While this proposed combination is exciting, Microsoft and Yahoo! remain separate companies and will continue to compete in the marketplace.

Q: What can I expect going forward?

A: It’s business as usual and, as such, your commitments remain unchanged. Please stay focused on your key priorities, whether it’s a technical product roadmap, serving our advertiser or publisher customers, or connecting with users of our services. It’s important that we stay focused on our business commitments and let the process for the transaction take its course.

At the appropriate times, we will update you further on progress and news regarding this proposed transaction.

Thanks again for your continued focus on our business and customers during this period.

Regards,

Kevin Johnson, President
Microsoft Platforms & Services Division


admin @ 10:11 pm
Filed under: General and Marketing on line and Internet - Computers
SonoWebs. Ahora tu blog habla.

Posted on Sunday 18 November 2007

SonoWebs es una nueva manera divertida de dotar mayor interactividad a tu blog, segú dicen ellos en su página:

SonoWebs es un componente que proporciona voz propia a cualquier noticia escrita en una Web o un Blog (WordPress, Blogger…).

De esta forma cambiamos radicalmente el concepto de Blog mediante la única posibilidad de su lectura y aportamos el concepto de escucha de cada una de las noticias del Blog. Permitiendo así realizar otras tareas mientras nos nutrimos de su información.

El sistema consiste en la creación automática de un archivo de sonido en MP3 para cada noticia que el lector de la web podrá reproducir en vez de leer.

Un objetivo primordial del proyecto es facilitar el acceso a la gran cantidad de información presente en la blogosfera a las personas con problemas visuales. Para ello pedimos la colaboración de los bloggers.

Mediante una sencilla instalación del Plugin, en varios minutos dotaremos a nuestro Blog de sonido en todas y cada una de las entradas de este.


Lo acabo de instalar ( es muy sencillo ) por lo que ahora todas las entradas del blog podrán escucharse.
Por el momento , aunque es divertido, he notado 2 peros, por un lado, el robot a veces se lía con el código y no se entiende lo que dice, por otro lado, puedes configurar el idioma en que se reproduce el texto ( Un único idioma por blog ) , lo que en blogs como el mío que mezclan idiomas ( inglés y español en este caso ) puede ser un problema, ya que cuando el robot encuentra un texto en un idioma diferente al que se ha configurado, pronuncia con la fonética de ese idioma, lo que hace el texto incomprensible, no obstante es muy divertido escuchar un texto en inglés con fonética española, parece mi madre leyendo a Shakespeare, podéis hacer la prueba :-)


admin @ 3:45 pm
Filed under: General and Internet - Computers
¿Está tu cerebro bien desarrollado?

Posted on Sunday 18 November 2007

>cafe.jpg

Dicen que se forma parte de un estudio científico, aunque ninguna de las fuentes lo enlaza ni da más detalles sobre él. Pero lo que sí es seguro es que te va a resultar divertido:

En esta fotografía hay un hombre escondido (su rostro):

  • Si eres capaz de descubrirlo antes de tres segundos, es que tienes un cerebro más desarrollado que la media.
  • Si lo haces antes de un minuto, tienes un cerebro de desarrollo normal.
  • Si tardas más de un minuto, entonces es que el hemisferio derecho de tu cerebro es lento y necesita un aporte de proteínas.

Añado:

Si no lo encuentras nunca, entonces puede que sea cosa de la vista y no del cerebro

No es nuevo, pero no lo había visto antes.

Vía Mangas verdes


admin @ 2:53 pm
Filed under: General and Curiosidades
Escribiendo Copy para tus Anuncios online

Posted on Thursday 3 May 2007

No basta con escribir un anuncio y ponerlo online en CopyBlogger me he encontrado con este artículo con interesantes recomendaciones para escribir copy online. Imperdible.

Copywriting 101

Copywriting is one of the most essential elements of effective online marketing. Whether you are looking to sell something or to build traffic by earning links from others, you´ll need to tell compelling stories that grab attention and connect with people. This tutorial is designed to get you up and running with the basics of writing great copy in ten easy lessons.

Write Killer Copy
Copywriting Software Improves Your Sales By Drawing on the Experience Of Thousands Of Successful Marketers.
  1. Don’t Read This (or the Kitty Gets It)!
  2. To Be or Not To Be?
  3. How to Write Headlines That Work
  4. Why Writing Headlines Deserves a Second Installment
  5. The Structure of Persuasive Copy
  6. Now Featuring Benefits!
  7. “Kids Eat Free” and Other Irresistible Offers
  8. This Article Rocks. . . I Guarantee It!
  9. The Long and Short of Copywriting
  10. The #1 Secret to Great Copy Is. . .


admin @ 3:55 pm
Filed under: General and Marketing on line and Seo - Posicionamiento
El primero en Google

Posted on Saturday 14 April 2007

Articulo publicado por Sergio Monge el 12 de Abril de 2007.

Qué hay que hacer para salir el primero en Google
Hay cosas que doy por tan obvias que no se me ocurre que debería escribir sobre ellas. Sobre SEO, posicionamiento u optimización de páginas web para buscadores hay infinidad de información escrita en la web. Y, de hecho, es gracias a ella que yo puedo hacer mi trabajo hoy en día. Sin embargo, cada vez que pregunto a un comunicador jóven a ver si sabe qué es eso del posicionamiento me responde “ah, eso es lo de los metatags, ¿no?”. En este artículo, me voy a limitar a exponer algunas generalidades que todo aquel que quiera hacer comunicación en Internet debe conocer. La pregunta es… ¿qué debo hacer para que Google me situe entre los primeros resultados de búsqueda para la(s) palabra(s) elegida(s)?

Al parecer, el 20% de la respuesta depende exclusivamente de la infraestructura tecnológica: ¿cómo de rápido se carga la página? ¿cómo de rápido reacciona el servidor en el que está alojada? ¿cómo de buena es la red que la rodea? En este paso, lo único que se puede hacer es pagar por un buen servicio.

El siguiente 40% depende de lo que yo llamo posicionamiento social. La teoría que está en la base de este sistema de discriminación por importancia en la red se denomina “Análisis de Redes Sociales” (Social Network Analysis) y, principalmente, debe ser obra de algunos sesudos investigadores de Harvard. Si queréis profundizar un poco os recomiendo este libro. La idea básica es que una persona (web) es más importante dentro de una red social (internet) cuantas más otras personas (webs) le citen (enlacen). Por lo tanto, el número de enlaces externos que recibe tu web ayuda a determinar en que posición la muestra Google en sus resultados. No obstante, Google no puntúa todos los enlaces iguales: los enlaces de las páginas que a su vez reciben más enlaces son más valiosos. Para establecer estas diferencias de importacia, Google puntúa con un número la importancia de tu sitio web. Ese número se denomina PageRank (por Larry Page, uno de los fundadores de Google). Con la barra de herramientas de Google puedes ver el PageRank de tu web en una escala del 0 al 10 (que es un logaritmo del valor real, mucho más elevado).

El último 40% de la respuesta está en lo que yo llamo posicionamiento tecnológico. Google no sólo te posiciona en función de lo importante que sea tu página con respecto a las demás, porque serían las mismas webs las que aparecerían siempre en primera posición. También te posiciona en función de la “densidad” de los términos de búsqueda (las palabras que escribes en el buscador) en tu página web. La densidad es el porcentaje de veces que esa palabra aparece en tu texto. Es decir, cuantas más veces tenga tu página web una determinada palabra, más probable es que Google te saque primero por ese término. No obstante, no todas las palabras tienen el mismo peso. El título de la página web y su ruta (la dirección web: http://…) son muchísimo más importantes que una palabra escrita en medio de un cuerpo de texto. La importancia de las palabras contenidas dentro de la etiqueta alt de las imágenes suele depender del tamaño de las mismas. Las palabras que aparecen en los hipervínculos o en los títulos de las secciones (etiquetas H) también son más importantes que el texto normal, así como las palabras en negrita o las que se encuentran más cerca del inicio de la página. El algoritmo que determina la densidad de un determinado término en una página web es complejo y, evidentemente, no se conoce completamente.

Además, creo que hay otros factores que influyen en el posicionamiento. No obstante, aún no tengo demasiadas pruebas al respecto. Está claro, por ejemplo, que el idioma en el que navegues influye enormemente en los resultados mostrados (dando mayor importancia aquellos que están escritos en tu idioma). Creo también que los resultados más próximos geográficamente se muestran antes que los más lejanos.

Seguramente habrá otros cientos de factores, pero la idea de este artículo era simplemente ofrecer una visión general para que la próxima vez que hable con alguien sobre este tema no me mire como si hiciera algún tipo de vudú prohibido de la polinesia. Posicionar una web en Google es cuestión de tener un poco de sentido común, observar las leyes generales de lo que está bien o mal para los buscadores y aplicar algo de ingenio. Y, sobre todo, el trabajo de posicionamiento debe estar unido a la construcción y mantenimiento del sitio web. No se puede construir una web de cualquier manera y luego contratar a alguien para que te la posicione. Eso no funciona. El experto en SEO debe aconsejarte desde el nacimiento de la web.


admin @ 6:31 pm
Filed under: General and Marketing on line and Internet - Computers
Previsualizaciones de los links

Posted on Saturday 24 February 2007

El buscador Snap ha lanzado una aplicación genial que permite a las visitas de tu blog o web previsualizar los enlaces sin más que pasar el puntero del ratón por encima. Ya lo he instalado en el blog y podéis comprobar su funcionamiento, funciona simplementa genial y enriquece muchísimo el blog el poder ver previsualizaciones de las webs de las que estás hablando en un post o anotación.

Basta pegar el código que te facilitan en la plantilla de tu blog entre las etiquetas head de las misma y listo, ya lo tienes instalado. Una aplicación genial que os recomiendo.

¿He dicho que es gratuita?

Vía| Techcrunch